In many organizations, perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team. Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages. First of all, a group of people has a wider range of knowledge, expertise, and the skills than any single individual is likely to possess. Also, because of the number of people involved and the greater resources they possess, a group can work more quickly in response to the task assigned to it and can come up with highly creative solutions to problems and issues. Sometimes these creative solution come about because a group is more likely to make a risky decision that an individual might not undertake. This is because the group spreads responsibility for a decision to all the members and thus no single individual can be held accountable if the decision turns out to be wrong.
Taking part in a group process can be very rewarding for members of the team. Team members who have a voice in making a decision will no doubt feel better about carrying out the work that is entailed by that decision than they might doing work that is imposed on them by others. Also, the individual team member has a much better chance to ‘shine’ to get his or her contributions and ideas not only recognized but recognized as highly significant, because a teams overall results can be more far-reaching and have greater impact than what might have otherwise been possible for the person to accomplish or contribute working alone.
The reading and the lecture is talking about the group participation in a project. The reading entails the benefits of group accomplishments and provide three reasons to support it. The lecturer is opposed group participation and refute each of the reasons.
First, the passage states that when cluster of people working together, they work fast and it helps to save time. However, the lecturer challenge this statement and says they are not helpful to maintain time rather they delay the project time. He or she also states that, they malingerer the time schedule because of the different members choice regarding the meeting time.
Second, the reading claims that group accomplishment easy to finish the project by taking audacious decision and it also give importance other members of the same group. Nevertheless, the lecturer dispute this statements. Lecturer delineates that, the influential member of the group often disregard non-influential members opinion. And the influential members shirk others choices, ideas.
Third, the passage assumes that, when people are working together they have the chance to get the reward due to the various expertise comments and their arduous efforts. The lecturer states the position is problematic. He or she expose that, some are the members always get benefits from group success without doing any effort than others members who gave great effort. And he or she calls them free rider.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd provide three reasons to support it. The lecturer is opposed group participation...
^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...y taking audacious decision and it also give importance other members of the same gr...
^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...oup. Nevertheless, the lecturer dispute this statements. Lecturer delineates that, t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l members shirk others choices, ideas. Third, the passage assumes that, when pe...
^^^
Line 7, column 230, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'exposes'.
Suggestion: exposes
... the position is problematic. He or she expose that, some are the members always get b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, second, so, third, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1216.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35682819383 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66418956411 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1334545099 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.8571428571 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2142857143 21.698381199 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129483864424 0.272083759551 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455138370868 0.0996497079465 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435690184274 0.0662205650399 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0802418485357 0.162205337803 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0235405884011 0.0443174109184 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.