Both the author and the speaker talk about the causes of the Great depression through the late 1920s. The article explains this failure by providing three factors and the lecture further contributes to the factors given in the article.
Firstly, the article explains how the values of shares in the Stock Market decreased dramatically. The lecturer claims that this problem was due to immense economic growth. Also, he mentions the high unemployment rate would cause more problems.
Secondly, the author points out the failure of banks in this period and how people stopped trusting them. Therefore, banks couldn't find any investment and went bankrupt. The loss of people's personal savings and trust in banks were damaged, the professor explains. Additionally, due to this failure, farmers lost a great number of crops. Therefore, the speaker hypothesizes that these caused more problems in the destruction of the economy.
Lastly, the article points out that due to the lack of dynamicity of the market, in which people buy and sell goods, the market continued to go downward. Although the government tried to heal the economy, the professor argues, it couldn't solve the problems. And, he continued to argue that each of these factors contributed to more and more problems during the Great Depression perion.
Overall, the article suggests several factors that cause to Great Depression, and the lecturer claims that each problem caused more problems.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people stopped trusting them. Therefore, banks couldnt find any investment and we...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...topped trusting them. Therefore, banks couldnt find any investment and went bankrupt. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lost a great number of crops. Therefore, the speaker hypothesizes that these caus...
^^
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...l the economy, the professor argues, it couldnt solve the problems. And, he continued t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 232.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32327586207 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59225944055 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530172413793 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.6688880877 49.2860985944 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2142857143 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5714285714 21.698381199 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06452816374 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 4.45695364238 269% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194643360259 0.272083759551 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661275233978 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0401409441319 0.0662205650399 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11038219868 0.162205337803 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0160763692402 0.0443174109184 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.8541721854 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.