new kind of broccoli on the east coast
The passage presents some potential advantages of growing a new type of broccoli on the East Coast of the United States. The lecturer, however, remains unconvinced, and she refutes all the arguments that are present in the reading. She claims the new broccoli might not be as successful as its creators persume. Her further demonstrations are as follows.
First, although it is true that the new broccoli produced on the East Coast will cause a decline in transportation costs, this does not necessarily mean a lower sale price for consumers. While the new broccoli is resisant to hot summers, it has also lower yields. Thus, farmers have smaller quantity of products per acre, and subsequently, they need to set a higher price for broccoli to make profit. Collectively, consumer costs are not likely to differ.
Second, even though the new broccoli will be created by the employment of traditional breeding techniques, the public will probably remain suspicious. The funding for this project is provided by the companies that previously produced genetically modified crops. Hence, people are inclined to distrust a product that is created under the supervision of these companies regardless of their claim about application of traditional breeding methods in this project.
Finally, whereas broccoli indeed contains most of its beneficial nutrients right after it is cut, this does not provide reasonable support for growing a new type of broccoli on the East Coast. There are a variety of other vegetables that can be readily grown on the East Coast with comparative or even more health advantages, such as cale, which can grow on the East Coast all year long. Instead of creating a new type of broccoli, we should encourage people to consume other vegetables that are equally beneficial and naturally cultivated on the East Coast.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'lowed', 'lowered'.
Suggestion: lowed; lowered
...is resisant to hot summers, it has also lower yields. Thus, farmers have smaller quan...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, hence, however, if, second, so, thus, whereas, while, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 298.0 270.72406181 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19127516779 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83127031869 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8737183269 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.417941871012 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137541906919 0.0996497079465 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.125296081271 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250991668635 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120537850523 0.0443174109184 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.