the possibility of clay jars to be used as electric batteries in ancient times.
The reading passage and the recording both discuss the possibility of clay jars in Iraq to be an electric batteries in ancient times. While the reading disagrees with that opinion, the lecturer believes the opinion is possiblly true.
To begin with, the reading claims that since there is no evidence for metal wires and other electric conductors, the prediction is unreasonable. However, the professor contradicts this by saying that those evidences were not found because of the limitation in ability of local people to recognize them due to the lack of archeology training.
Second, the reading passage mentions that the copper cylinders inside the vessels could be used for holding scrolls, rather than producing electricity because they are are similar to the copper cylinders in the ruins of Seleucia. Nonetheless, to challenge that point, the lecturer says that it can not prove anything. She provides later findings showing that the vessels with liquid could generate electricity. Admitting that they might be made for other purpose, but they ended up being adapted for producing electricity.
Finally, to contradict the claim of the writer that electricity as well as batteries in the ancient times were useless, the professor provides two possibilities in which electricity could be used effectively. The first one is to cause a mild shock to show invisible power in order to convince pther people. The second possibility, she mentions, is for healing, the same way as modern medication do such as stimulating muscle and improving brain activity.
That is how the professor thinks the points in the reading passage are unconvincing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-10 | Shahjahan khandakar | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-08 | joeyrussell007 | 3 | view |
| 2023-07-16 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
| 2023-03-14 | sonyeoso | 90 | view |
| 2022-12-15 | subashdevkota | 3 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...than producing electricity because they are are similar to the copper cylinders in the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, nonetheless, second, so, well, while, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1385.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 262.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28625954198 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82428563704 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591603053435 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 419.366225166 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4603933354 49.2860985944 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.416666667 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288066406371 0.272083759551 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921410730666 0.0996497079465 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.164162067282 0.0662205650399 248% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13966554746 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131732131824 0.0443174109184 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.3589403974 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 63.6247240618 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.