The reading and the lecture are both about univesity professors who appear on television programs. The author of the reading feels that there are three advantages by showing on television. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that they does not get advantages.
To begin with, author argues that attending in television program they gain good reputation in their campus. The article mentions that when they represent their ideas on television more vast population take interest on them. this specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that by appearing television they get more disadvatages than advantages. Additionally, she says professors who appear on television are seen as entartainers rather than real academic professional.
Secondly, writer suggests that univsities benefits from their television attentance. In the article, it is said that univsities obtain public positivity. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that professors lose valueable time by showing on television. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that they use their actual work time for television preparation. Consequently, the universitie's reputation is going to affect.
Finally, author posits that general public benefits from professors who appear on television. Moreover, in the article it is said that majority of people who do not have contact with the professors have possibility get in-depth knowledge about different topics. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that television programs does not want in-depth knowledge about different topics. She notes that a a general idea about a specific topic is more than enough for the public,and that can be provided by any television reporter who does little bit of research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ee advantages by showing on television. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'do'
Suggestion: do
...author. She is of the opinion that they does not get advantages. To begin with, ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... vast population take interest on them. this specific argument is challenged by the ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'universities'' or 'university's'?
Suggestion: universities'; university's
...levision preparation. Consequently, the universities reputation is going to affect. Fina...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 29, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...affect. Finally, author posits that general public benefits from professors who appear on ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: a
... about different topics. She notes that a a general idea about a specific topic is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... about different topics. She notes that a a general idea about a specific topic i...
^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'a' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: a; a
... about different topics. She notes that a a general idea about a specific topic is ...
^^^
Line 7, column 473, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , and
...topic is more than enough for the public,and that can be provided by any television ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 535, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ded by any television reporter who does little bit of research.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 22.412803532 152% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53818181818 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96693402702 2.5805825403 115% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523636363636 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.0710948778 49.2860985944 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6111111111 110.228320801 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161202868661 0.272083759551 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515186095377 0.0996497079465 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668867002628 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102270369386 0.162205337803 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407883576185 0.0443174109184 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.2367328918 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.