quacker
TPO 32
Both the author and the lecturer discuss theories about the source of “quackers”. The passage claims that there are several theories about what might have caused the odd sounds. The professor, on the other hand, completely rejects whatever mentioned in the reading through citing three reasons.
First, both the author and the professor talk about the strange noises produced by Ocra whales. According to the passage, the Ocra whale’s sounds when they are trying to attract a male are similar to those that the submarines were detecting. The lecturer, nevertheless, rejects the author's view and illustrates the idea that the Ocra whales live near the surface of water and submarines are located in the depth of water. Therefore, the submarines cannot receive the Ocra whale's sound.
Second of all, both the reading and the lecture discuss giant squids. The author argues that it is possible they have the ability to emit sound, and perhaps they approached the submarines without curiosity. However, the professor refutes this, saying that squids have always lived in the ocean, so it is unlikely that their sounds were detected in 1960 but disappeared by 1980.Therefore, this sound cannot has to do with the squids.
Eventually, the passage and the lecture address the subject of existing other country's submarines in the Russian's oceans. The passage goes on to mention that another country's submarines were secretly patrolling the area, so the strange sounds may have been emitted by the foreign submarines unintendedly. In contrast, the professor points out that the strange sounds change their directions very quickly and the foreign submarines are not fast enough to change their rout too fast and they are not fashioned enough to change their direct without any noise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...etected in 1960 but disappeared by 1980.Therefore, this sound cannot has to do with the s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 558, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... change their direct without any noise.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, may, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, as to, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 286.0 270.72406181 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28671328671 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70383509867 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527972027972 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2515483022 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.307692308 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 21.698381199 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461550322151 0.272083759551 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160533203406 0.0996497079465 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124975983295 0.0662205650399 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.260522039237 0.162205337803 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994662644828 0.0443174109184 224% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.