Both the lecture and the reading are about the painting of the Rembrandt-portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet. The author of the reading passage feels that the painting was not made by Rembrandt. However, the lecturer cast doubt on the claim made in the reading passage. He is of the opinion that the painting was originally made the Rembrandt.
First of all, the author argues that the painting was somewhat inconsistent. In the article, it is mentioned that the woman was wearing a dress that is only worn by the servants. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He says that originally the painting was consistent with the dress, but later, fur was added over the painting to increase the value of the product, as a result, the painting appears inconsistent nowadays.
Secondly, the writer contends that there is no matching of the light and shadow. In the article, it is mentioned that since Rembrandt is known for his mastery in painting, he can not make such an error. The speaker rebuts this claim by mentioning the original piece of the work is the best representation of the matching of light and shadow. He additionally says that in the original painting, there was the only white color cloth that reflects light and illuminated the woman's face.
Finally, the author posits that Rembrandt never uses a panel glued together for painting. In the article, it is mentioned that the backside of the painting reveals that it is made from several pieces of wood. In contrast, the lecturer is of the opinion that Rembrandt only used a single piece of wood for painting. He points out that initially he used a single piece of wood for painting, but later, due to the addition of fur, it size increased and required several pieces of wood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rom several pieces of wood. In contrast, the lecturer is of the opinion that Remb...
^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'sizes'?
Suggestion: sizes
...t later, due to the addition of fur, it size increased and required several pieces o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, in contrast, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1373.03311258 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75409836066 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67440112775 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43606557377 0.540411800872 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 419.366225166 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4950550702 49.2860985944 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.625 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0625 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325025656588 0.272083759551 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124093998732 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137599177327 0.0662205650399 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205545901508 0.162205337803 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131470391592 0.0443174109184 297% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 53.8541721854 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.0289183223 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.2367328918 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.