Some people think that human needs for farmland housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals Do you agree or disagree with this point of view Why or why not Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

Essay topics:

Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer

In this contemporary age, human activities introduce a tremendous revolution. I agree with the idea that people's want for land activity is more crucial than keeping wild animals. I feel this way for two reasons which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, it promotes a stable economy. People using land for various activities will surely increase the economy situation of the environment because this will create an immense opportunity for people from neighbouring countries to take part and indulge themselves in the recent activity whereby enhancing the economy of the place. Moreover, involving land in various activities will help creating more employment thereby leading to free flow of money in circulation that will actually boost and make the economy stable. For instance, my father constructed a big cocoa company on his land in the village. The merchant started trooping into our village because of this company to engage in the buying and selling of cocoa products. As a result of this, our village is well-known and this has brought enormous opportunities to the village and youth are no more seeking for jobs. Therefore, with the help of transforming our land, we can boom our economy.
Secondly, it helps in meeting people’s need. Our wants can only be eradicated by making use of our land, whereby we transform it into an asset instead of making it a liability. A land using for cultivation will surely provides food for consumption and serves as source of income to the farmers, however, saving endangered animal on the land has no benefits. For example, my friend used one of her father’s properties given to her when he died, a land, for cultivating cash crops only. In the harvest period, she always smiles because of the amount she obtains from this business. As a result of this, she was able to sponsor herself to the university level.
In conclusion, I strongly belief that, people's wants for land use is important for economy improvement and making provision for their needs than keeping of endangered animals on land<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre="economy "></span>.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 389, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to create' or 'create'.
Suggestion: to create; create
...ng land in various activities will help creating more employment thereby leading to free...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'provide'
Suggestion: provide
... land using for cultivation will surely provides food for consumption and serves as sour...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...apos; pre='economy '>.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 22.412803532 174% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1373.03311258 131% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20579710145 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27019728704 2.5805825403 127% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 145.348785872 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 419.366225166 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 3.25607064018 369% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 8.23620309051 36% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0346949959 49.2860985944 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.647058824 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06452816374 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 4.33554083885 277% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27638240565 0.272083759551 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870272373611 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646990823501 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188683561682 0.162205337803 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295662055948 0.0443174109184 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.