sub
Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether the sound detected by the Russian sound comes from any marin animals or other enemies submarines. The former proposed three plausible theories about the source of the sound where the latter contradicts all the points made by the reading.
First of all, the reading claims that, the noice can be produced by Orca whales since the sound are simillar to the sound produced by the wheal while they tried to attack the other mate. However, the lecturer argues that, the Orca wheals are living on the surface of the sea and the submarines that detected the sound were deep into the wather so it was quite impossible for the submarine to detect the sound made by the wheales.
Secondly, The author contends that, giant squid's complex brain system indicates that they are intelligent enough to make this types of sounds as they have no bone so they remained highly undetected by the submarine. In contrast, the listening counters that, the sounds were detected during the two decades of 1960 to 1980 and after the period the sound are not more present there but still ther are lots of squid present on that particulat part of the sea. So, if the sound were made by the squid than they can be still detect there.
Finally, the text asserts that, another countries submerine with high undetectable tech might also produce the sound but due to their advanced technology the Russian submarine could not detect them. On the other hand, the listening rebuts that, the source of the mysterious sounds were moving around very fastly which is still impossible for todays highly developed submarine. Ha also adds that, even todays submarine can not move around such swiftly and their engine can create sound which was completely different tfrom the sound detected by the Russian submarine.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 458, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[4]
Message: “So , if” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ent on that particulat part of the sea. So, if the sound were made by the squid than t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, in contrast, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 30.3222958057 115% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1373.03311258 111% => OK
No of words: 310.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90322580645 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25639569669 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545161290323 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 21.2450331126 146% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7133105118 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.0 110.228320801 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 21.698381199 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.3589403974 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 53.8541721854 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.498013245 137% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.