Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
TPO 48
The main idea of both the lecture and the passage is whether some proposed ways in order to avoid declining frog populations are practical or not. Considering this, the author presents some ways to protect frogs. The professor, on the other hand, unequivocally challenges whatever contended in the reading by posing some problems.
First, both the lecturer and the author talk about pesticides which are used in agriculture. As claimed by the passage, pesticides have adverse effects such as severe breathing problems on frogs in farming lands which are near to the frog habitats. Therefore, it is useful to adopt strict laws to inhibit farmers to use such a harmful material in areas in adjacent to frogs habitats. The professor, nevertheless, contradicts the author's view and explains that it is not fair to restrict some farmers to not use pesticides when other farmers are allowed to use them because the number of their products and their profits are reduced.
Second of all, both the lecture and the reading discuss fungus which causes the frog's skins to become thicker so that they have a problem with absorbing water. The passage goes on to mention that a large scale treatment should apply in order to kill the fungus. In contrast, the lecturer explains that this treatment would have a profound impact, if it applied to each individual frogs. Also, some gene passes to their next generation so that the treatment should apply to the new generation which seems that complex and expensive.
The last point discussed in the passage is that frog habitats such as water land should be better protected from human activities. However, the professor rejects this by declaring that the development of waterland has a minor effect to survive frog populations because global warming causes waterland and water to dry up.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the reading by posing some problems. First, both the lecturer and the author ...
^^^
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... agriculture. As claimed by the passage, pesticides have adverse effects such as ...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and their profits are reduced. Second of all, both the lecture and the ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08940397351 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60912864772 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543046357616 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0182856033 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.230769231 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408270203489 0.272083759551 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134974192281 0.0996497079465 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0992936183195 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225029672544 0.162205337803 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0819995331855 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 63.6247240618 132% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.