Summarise the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they case doubt on specific points made in the reading passage.
Both the reading and the listening discuss the issue of the ethanol alternativeness. While the reading states that the ethanol is not good replacement for gasoline for some reasons, the listening casts doubt on each point made in the reading.
Firstly, according to the reading the ethanol causes global warming. It releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burned and helps increase heat in the atmosphere. The listening challenges this point by asserting that it is not adding the global warming. People made ethanol from plants and during the growing process that plants remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Secondly, the reading claims that the production of ethanol would decrease the amount of plants that are feed for the farm animals. 60 percent of the corn grow in the United States would have to be used to generate ethanol. The listening casts doubt on this point and mentions that creating ethanol does not reduce the amount of plants that grown for the animals. That plants are producing by using celulose and are adding to that plants that are not eaten by animals. For that reason the animals' feed will not be reduced.
Thirdly, the reading states that it will be never be able to comete ethanol and gasoline prices. Although tey are about the same on price, this only because government helps the producers of the ethanol in the form of taxes they give to government. And if the government were to stop helping, the prices of ethanol would increase greatly and it will be not much available. The listening rebutes this point, too and states that prices of gasoline and ethanol will be competable. In the the need of the ethanol will increase and the producers will increase the production of the ethanol. At that time the ethanol will be more available. And the cost of that in the near future would drop by 14 ppercend instead of increasing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bt on each point made in the reading. Firstly, according to the reading th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. Secondly, the reading claims that th...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 501, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by animals. For that reason the animals feed will not be reduced. Th...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he animals feed will not be reduced. Thirdly, the reading states that it ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 487, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...line and ethanol will be competable. In the the need of the ethanol will increase and t...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 487, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...line and ethanol will be competable. In the the need of the ethanol will increase and t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 7.30242825607 164% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1373.03311258 115% => OK
No of words: 322.0 270.72406181 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89130434783 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44457878446 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.419254658385 0.540411800872 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 479.7 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3708199022 49.2860985944 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.5 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 7.06452816374 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145603694358 0.272083759551 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524297658517 0.0996497079465 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467270826525 0.0662205650399 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103930618336 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371162046486 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.2367328918 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.