summarize the points made in the lecture about applications of rounded stones discovered in ancient places, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on various hypothesis made in the passage about them.
The reading explains different theories proposed about the application of carved and ball-shaped rounded stones. However, the professor in the lecture opposes with these arguments and gives three reasons to refute each of the hypothesized assumptions in the reading.
First, the article mentions that these carved stones could have been used as different kinds of weapons for hunting or fighting purposes. But, she disagrees with this idea and finds it unconvincing, since the stones extracted from specific places generally showed several cracks and fragments which are in contrast with their original desired application as strong batteling tools.
Second, the passage argues that they may be occasionally applied as measuring equipment in those periods due to their unique smooth shape. In contrary, professor insists that logically they can not be considered for this application, because these stones were mostly made of various sources like sands and other materials. So, they definatelly varied in densities and can not be accurately implemented as measuring tools.
Third, the reading discusses that these round stones might have had some social values in those eras. On the other hand, professor reminds that if these stones were presious and important they must have been found in the ancient graves where people buried dead bodies along side their valuable things like jewlary. Thus, this fact shows clearly that these stones can not have any social importance for people of that period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 269, Rule ID: ALONG_SIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'alongside'?
Suggestion: alongside
... graves where people buried dead bodies along side their valuable things like jewlary. Thu...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, thus, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 233.0 270.72406181 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49785407725 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50559983642 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643776824034 0.540411800872 119% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 419.366225166 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0259502828 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1 110.228320801 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06452816374 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172261484007 0.272083759551 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0655770859902 0.0996497079465 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451951867845 0.0662205650399 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0973225784769 0.162205337803 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439328917422 0.0443174109184 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 63.6247240618 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.