summarize the points made in the lecture about origin of silver coins that speculated to be brought to US by Norse people, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made in the reading about these silver coins.
The reading discusses about why some archaeologists believe that silver coins are not a genuine historical object which had been brought into North America from Europe. However, the professor in the lecture thinks that these arguments are not generally true. She provides three reasons to refute the statements given in the reading.
First, the article states that the site where these objects were found initially is too far from other common places where related evidence discovered about these coins. But, the professor opposed with this view, since other related objects are also found in distanced places where Norse people traveled there.
Second, the passage explains it is improbable that Norse people brought these coins to North America, because no other kinds of coins were found in the region. In contrary, she mentions that they may carried them along with their other stuff in their bag packs and returned them to their country after they finish their trip to North America probably.
Third, the reading regards that the Norse people who traveled to north America understood the fact that silver coins had no value at that time there. So, they avoided bringing them with themselves. On the other hand, professor reminds that although silver coins may had not been recognized as money in North America, they can be used as objects for jewelry. This fact could be derived from the great desire of ancient North American people to attractive new objects which they wanted to use for various applications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h their trip to North America probably. Third, the reading regards that the Nors...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 7.30242825607 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 248.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17338709677 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25087782044 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6522698282 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.636363636 110.228320801 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179953350483 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695691881632 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455919664602 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107328289167 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318564561552 0.0443174109184 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.2367328918 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 63.6247240618 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.