Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
The article and the lecture are both discussing about the replacing of digital recording of patient's medical data with traditional paper recording. The article describes three advantages of using new procedures. The professor dismisses all the reading's claims by saying that these benefits of electronic databases are actually uncertain.
First of all, the article posits that electronic databases could reduce costs. The professor refutes this point by saying that this procedure has not any saving effect. She explains that as doctors keep records for backup in paper edition, storing records in both kinds has the same costs.
Secondly, the reading asserts that electronic databases could prevent errors. The professor reasonably disputes this point by pointing out that most doctors still use pen and paper when they examining the patients. In this way, poor handwriting still could be one of the reasons of recording errors when staffs conveying data to electronic forms.
Lastly, the article argues that medical databases are one of significant sources of medical researches. The professor offers a counterargument by claiming that medical information is not easily accessible according to strict preventing lows in United States. The professor adds more details by saying that using patients' medical information cannot be used rather than their permission. She describes that patients can block their medical information even for any fundamental and necessary research.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree advantages of using new procedures. The professor dismisses all the readings cl...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'first', 'if', 'lastly', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'still', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.272727272727 0.261695866417 104% => OK
Verbs: 0.161157024793 0.158904122519 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.099173553719 0.0723426182421 137% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0537190082645 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0206611570248 0.0277247811725 75% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136363636364 0.128828473217 106% => OK
Participles: 0.0619834710744 0.0370669169778 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.7423422086 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00826446280992 0.0208969081088 40% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00413223140496 0.00154638098197 267% => OK
Determiners: 0.111570247934 0.128158765124 87% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0206611570248 0.0158828679856 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00826446280992 0.0114777025283 72% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1484.0 1645.83664459 90% => OK
No of words: 223.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.65470852018 6.08160592843 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.466367713004 0.374372842146 125% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.37668161435 0.287516216867 131% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.251121076233 0.187439937562 134% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.201793721973 0.113142543107 178% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7423422086 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578475336323 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 56.0757021567 53.8517498576 104% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.1538461538 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.3822384448 49.3711431718 55% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 132.220823453 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1538461538 21.7502111507 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.692307692308 0.878197800319 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 54.8220075888 50.5018328374 109% => OK
Elegance: 2.0 1.90840788429 105% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266007671736 0.549887131256 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.115626544502 0.142949733639 81% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0699544068657 0.0787303798458 89% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.57810747873 0.631733273073 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.083569967184 0.139662658121 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122310628782 0.266732575781 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520153288625 0.103435571967 50% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.279423273836 0.414875509568 67% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0416714961073 0.0530846634433 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193720318573 0.40443939384 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0472573946185 0.0528353158467 89% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.26048565121 117% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.