Team work to complete a project.
The reading and the lecture are both about forming group to perform a certain job in a organization. The author of the passage believes that to build team for completion of a certain project is always beneficial for the organization. However, the lecturer challenges the claim of the author and he cited some examples to rebut the author's conclusion.
First of all, the author mentions that group is made up of different people from varieties background, which resulted into wide ranges of knowledge and expertise. This facilitates the organization to complete the project efficiently. The lecturer rebuts the author's claim. He believes that completing a project by forming team is not a wise decision. Because, in a group all members does not perform their duty properly. There always exits free rider problem in performing a tasks with a team. In a team, there will be few person who does not do their responsibility, yet they will get the reward as the team successfully completes the project. This will give the rise of grievances to the member, who actively perform their jobs.
Secondly, the author believes that the team can take risky decisions because if that decision fails then all the members will be responsible and it encourages the team to take risky decision. Sometimes these risky decisions can be profitable for the organization's perspective. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that in a team there will be one/two influential members, who always try to impose their decision without ignoring the opinions of other members. This kind of activity gives rise of conflict among group members.
Finally, the reader asserts that members of a team has also incentive to work vigorously. Because if a person of a team shows extraordinary talents in performing a job, then the management of the company will recognize him. However, the lecturer argues that it is not always true. Because in a team, it difficult to segregate the outstanding performer.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rming group to perform a certain job in a organization. The author of the passage...
^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...and he cited some examples to rebut the authors conclusion. First of all, the author...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...amples to rebut the authors conclusion. First of all, the author mentions that g...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ferent people from varieties background, which resulted into wide ranges of knowl...
^^
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...by forming team is not a wise decision. Because, in a group all members does not perfor...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 377, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'member'?
Suggestion: member
... wise decision. Because, in a group all members does not perform their duty properly. T...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a task' or simply 'tasks'?
Suggestion: a task; tasks
... exits free rider problem in performing a tasks with a team. In a team, there will be f...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 521, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'few people', 'few persons'.
Suggestion: few people; few persons
...s with a team. In a team, there will be few person who does not do their responsibility, y...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 251, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'organizations'' or 'organization's'?
Suggestion: organizations'; organization's
...sky decisions can be profitable for the organizations perspective. On the other hand, the lec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to segregate the outstanding performer.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 30.3222958057 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1373.03311258 120% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06461538462 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86543324688 2.5805825403 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504615384615 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 419.366225166 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3410107554 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6315789474 110.228320801 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1052631579 21.698381199 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 4.33554083885 254% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307622883514 0.272083759551 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959951494581 0.0996497079465 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118170309477 0.0662205650399 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174191231919 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0757611382728 0.0443174109184 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.