There has been much discussion about whether our early human ancestors, the Homo erectus species, were first able to control fire on a regular basis. Many archaeologists believe that some 1.6 million year ago, the early human ancestors referred to as Hominins had control over fire when they emerged from Africa.
Disputing the passage's arguments that the Homo erectus species had control over fire approximately 1.6 million years ago, the professor cites several pieces of evidence showing that humans did not control fire until 400000 years ago.
First, the professor takes exception to the passage's claim that the human ancestors relied on cooked food for nutrition to support their highly developed bodies and brains. While it is true that cooked foods are rich in nutrients, they aren't the only nutritious food source. Rather, the species had excellent sources of vegetation, such as root vegetables. Moreover, their teeth were well-suited for tearing and chewing meat so they could take in plenty of nutrition from raw meat.
Second, dismissing the passage's argument that there are fire traces indicating that this species had created fire, the professor maintains that the geological time of these traces is not earlier than one million years ago. Furthermore, it is also likely that they utilized natural sources of fire, such as lightning and volcano, instead of producing one by themselves.
Third, he believes that the freezing environment during this time doesn't mean that the human species had no choice but to rely on fire. Instead, they could take advantage of natural resources. For example, they could take shelter in caves. What's more, they could also make warm clothes to keep off the chill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Disputing the passages arguments that th...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t control fire until 400000 years ago. First, the professor takes exception to ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...ooked foods are rich in nutrients, they arent the only nutritious food source. Rather...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in plenty of nutrition from raw meat. Second, dismissing the passages argument...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 29, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'passages'' or 'passage's'?
Suggestion: passages'; passage's
... raw meat. Second, dismissing the passages argument that there are fire traces ind...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nstead of producing one by themselves. Third, he believes that the freezing env...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 72, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...e freezing environment during this time doesnt mean that the human species had no choi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 245, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...mple, they could take shelter in caves. Whats more, they could also make warm clothes...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, second, so, third, well, while, for example, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 30.3222958057 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23111111111 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44894131825 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622222222222 0.540411800872 115% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7080807997 49.2860985944 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.54545454545 7.06452816374 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181699917124 0.272083759551 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.058591003914 0.0996497079465 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750829270591 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118775385412 0.162205337803 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773141779497 0.0443174109184 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.