The author says that Chevalier invented many events in his memoir to make his life seem more glamorous. However, the professor says that even though there is no memoir completely correct, but Chevalier's memoir is pretty accurate and has reliable historical source, and the professor refutes each of the author's critics point.
Firstly, the author avers that Chevalier was not a wealthy man as he claimed because he was borrowing money from a Swiss merchant. However, the professor says that borrowing money from others does not mean that he was not wealthy, and she admits that Chevalier was having a lot of possessions, and he was borrowing money until he would find a seller for his possessions. That's why; Chevalier was not poor.
Secondly, the author avers that there is many critics are skeptical about the accuracy of the conversations record in his memoir that he met and conversed with the famous writer Voltaire because the the conversation was written many years after the conversations occurred. However, the professor admits that he wrote that in his memoir that he wrote down every thing about the conversation between him and Voltaire. Also, Chevalier and Voltaire were living with each other for a period of time.
Thirdly, the author claims that critics do not believe that Chevalier escaped from the prison in Venice by using a piece of metal to make a hole in ceiling, and they believed that Chevalier's jailers were bribed to free him. However, the professor says that when Chevalier at the prison, there were many other prisoners that have more power than him and they could not escape. Also, the Venice government assumed that Chevalier escaped through the ceiling, and there is evidence that the ceiling got repaired after his escaping. Therefore, there is a great evidence that Chevalier escaped from a prison in Venice through a hole he had done in the ceiling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 372, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...ould find a seller for his possessions. Thats why; Chevalier was not poor. Secondly...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are many critics'?
Suggestion: there are many critics
...poor. Secondly, the author avers that there is many critics are skeptical about the accuracy of the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...with the famous writer Voltaire because the the conversation was written many years aft...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...with the famous writer Voltaire because the the conversation was written many years aft...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 480, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...taire were living with each other for a period of time. Thirdly, the author claims that crit...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 7.30242825607 151% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 22.412803532 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1572.0 1373.03311258 114% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9746835443 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51286546988 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465189873418 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 488.7 419.366225166 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.4892995634 49.2860985944 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.0 110.228320801 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 21.698381199 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298256547031 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124043434315 0.0996497079465 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0747137397687 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190079535009 0.162205337803 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530207835132 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.3589403974 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.