The lecturer disputes the author's suggested claims that some of the information in Chevalier memoir are not accurate. He provides three concrete reasons to cast doubt about the author's claims.
First, the according to the author Chevalier was not a rich person because he borrowed money from rich merchants. However, the lecturer find this idea debatable. She points out that Chevalier indeed was a rich person and borrowing does not signify a sign of poverty. She contends that Chevalier may have borrowed some money, but this was only for a temporary period while he cash out the money generated from the sales of his properties.
Second, the lecturer contradict the fallacy of the passage that the information in the memoir about his conversation with Voltaire was not accurate because the later took place long time before he had a chance to report it. The lecturer contends that Chevalier was always writing notes about his contacts and he always refers back to them when he wrote the memoir.
Finally, the author claims that the information in the memoir about Chevalier's escape from prison is inaccurate because there is some evidence to support the idea that he was released from prison an did not escape. However, the lecturer refutes this theory. She suggests that theoretically he did escape from prison because non of the other prisoners were able to escape inspite of having strong relationships with influential people. More over, there are proves that the jail had to fix the ceiling of Chevalier room after his escape.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 57, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...putes the authors suggested claims that some of the information in Chevalier memoir are not...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...e idea that he was released from prison an did not escape. However, the lecturer r...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1289.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 255.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05490196078 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51893559354 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 145.348785872 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.540411800872 96% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 419.366225166 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.23620309051 85% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1479561217 49.2860985944 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.416666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 21.698381199 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06452816374 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217316867594 0.272083759551 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084114036669 0.0996497079465 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617554123689 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140128055808 0.162205337803 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0510750604664 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.3589403974 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.