The reading and lecture both discuss about the team work versus individual work for handling a project in a firm or company. The writer of the passage support the team work on the other hand, the professor refutes the claim provided by the writer for handling a project. The professor opines that individual work is better for handling a project.
First of all, the writer states that in the team all the member have different kind of knowledge, skills to handle the project and provide more effective results. In team work all the member's of team work has an responsibility for the good results of the project but the professor claim that in team work only few members are doing hard work and other gets free rides nonetheless, all the members gets equal recognition on the succession of the project.
secondly, the writer argues that all the member of the project have knowledge, skills for the success of the project but the professor refutes that individual member can handle project fast rather than team work. He states that in team work to reach out at any decision for project is slow down because all the member are not agree on the same decision.
Furthermore, The write claim that all the member get 'shine' on the success of project but the professor claims that if influenced people take any decision for the project most people support the influenced people and decision taken by the other people is ignored. If project gets failure then blame of failure goes to every people in the group.
Finally, The individual work on the project is far better than team work on the project.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...d by the writer for handling a project. The professor opines that individual work i...
^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...m work all the members of team work has an responsibility for the good results of ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...on on the succession of the project. secondly, the writer argues that all the member ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 327, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...low down because all the member are not agree on the same decision. Furthermore, T...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...e on the same decision. Furthermore, The write claim that all the member get shine on ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n taken by the other people is ignored. If project gets failure then blame of fail...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 22.412803532 40% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76978417266 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3786962281 2.5805825403 92% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.402877697842 0.540411800872 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 396.0 419.366225166 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0662251656 77% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.1994382 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.6 110.228320801 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9 7.06452816374 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.397227421881 0.272083759551 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195084998798 0.0996497079465 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616309174602 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258233448036 0.162205337803 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532518164811 0.0443174109184 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.2367328918 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.42419426049 84% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.