In the term of why some paintings which have been attributed to Rembrandt, actually were painted by him or not both the reading and the lecture are contradictory. One of this painting is the most attractive model to consider this contradiction.
First, reading says Rembrandt who has been famous as a details considering painter couldn't be painter of this painting with some obvious inconsistency such as woman in the painting wear servant linen cap and fur collar ( a cloth for high-level people on that time). In the lecture, professor says that peace which fur collar painted on is for one thousand years after Rembrandt painted original painting and this done by people who wanted to make painting more valuable.
Second, reading states fur collar because of light absorbing as a result of dark color should be cause a part woman face be shadowy and for, this painting can't be attributed to Rembrandt who had highly skillful in light and shadow adjustment. In the lecture professor refutes reading and expresses that this determine Rembrandt skillful because woman wears light cloth which reflect light toward her face .
Third, reading claims Rembrandt always painted on one wood panel but this painting painted on some clinging wood panels. In the lecture professor says, part of painting that was painted by Rembrandt locate on one wood panel but other panels relevant to people who wanted to enlarge that. Professor also says that single wood panel is of a similar three which Rembrandt used for other paintings.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...famous as a details considering painter couldnt be painter of this painting with some o...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng wear servant linen cap and fur collar a cloth for high-level people on that ti...
^^^
Line 3, column 95, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...orbing as a result of dark color should be cause a part woman face be shadowy and for, t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'caused'?
Suggestion: caused
...ing as a result of dark color should be cause a part woman face be shadowy and for, t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... face be shadowy and for, this painting cant be attributed to Rembrandt who had hig...
^^^^
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...for, this painting cant be attributed to Rembrandt who had highly skillful in lig...
^^
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...loth which reflect light toward her face . Third, reading claims Rembrandt always...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'such as', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.288389513109 0.261695866417 110% => OK
Verbs: 0.194756554307 0.158904122519 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0674157303371 0.0723426182421 93% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0299625468165 0.0435111971325 69% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00749063670412 0.0277247811725 27% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.134831460674 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0674157303371 0.0370669169778 182% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.54558775272 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0224719101124 0.0208969081088 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.101123595506 0.128158765124 79% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00374531835206 0.0158828679856 24% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0337078651685 0.0114777025283 294% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1521.0 1645.83664459 92% => OK
No of words: 252.0 271.125827815 93% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03571428571 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04852973271 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.376984126984 0.374372842146 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289682539683 0.287516216867 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.174603174603 0.187439937562 93% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.107142857143 0.113142543107 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54558775272 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 145.348785872 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.539623497131 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 47.8467561849 53.8517498576 89% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6560683903 49.3711431718 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.0 132.220823453 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 21.7502111507 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.39072847682 206% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 56.9682539683 50.5018328374 113% => OK
Elegance: 2.11290322581 1.90840788429 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.589524459401 0.549887131256 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.201696992644 0.142949733639 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.106724255958 0.0787303798458 136% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.704478097732 0.631733273073 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.102958997138 0.139662658121 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.29395028733 0.266732575781 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079996874993 0.103435571967 77% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.255125765009 0.414875509568 61% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0663915604898 0.0530846634433 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41638521046 0.40443939384 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0700095606646 0.0528353158467 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.