Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt. First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman inthe portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.
Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.
Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood. For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'but', 'finally', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.233438485804 0.261695866417 89% => OK
Verbs: 0.179810725552 0.158904122519 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0599369085174 0.0723426182421 83% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0536277602524 0.0435111971325 123% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0347003154574 0.0277247811725 125% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141955835962 0.128828473217 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0630914826498 0.0370669169778 170% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88967094997 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Infinitives: 0.018927444795 0.0208969081088 91% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.110410094637 0.128158765124 86% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220820189274 0.0158828679856 139% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.01261829653 0.0114777025283 110% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1668.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 281.0 271.125827815 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9359430605 6.08160592843 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.334519572954 0.374372842146 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274021352313 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.192170818505 0.187439937562 103% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.120996441281 0.113142543107 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88967094997 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 53.9572254724 53.8517498576 100% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7333333333 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0996354605 49.3711431718 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 132.220823453 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.466666666667 0.878197800319 53% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 46.1354685647 50.5018328374 91% => OK
Elegance: 1.63529411765 1.90840788429 86% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.993057197745 0.549887131256 181% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.13461008967 0.142949733639 94% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.110041863542 0.0787303798458 140% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.503571062266 0.631733273073 80% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.137667906902 0.139662658121 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3998392715 0.266732575781 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11334628263 0.103435571967 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.316573735818 0.414875509568 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0341889701848 0.0530846634433 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.741654726146 0.40443939384 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0762989672933 0.0528353158467 144% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Not in a correct format.
The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%) but more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.