In this set of material is discussed the theory about how the he Chaco structures were used, the reading and listening has been trying to determine according to the archaeologist works.
Firstly, is said in the passage that Chacon structures maybe were used as a residence; owing it seems to the apartment buildings at Taos. Conversely with the passage, the listening explain that the last affirmation is not possible because only exist a few places to cook in these structures, thus, is not possible to consider that a hundred families could live there.
Secondly, the passage argues that this built were used to store food supplies for long periods to be suitable for people. But, according to the listening, it is explained that were not found containers in excavations. Hence, the listening affirms that it is not a possibility.
Thirdly, the reading pointed out that houses were used as ceremonial centers. Architects found rests of broken pots, therefore this support the fact that buildings were ceremonial centers. Nevertheless, the lectures refute again the passage. In spite of, broken pots were found, these belongs to the construction workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'he'?
Suggestion: the; he
...erial is discussed the theory about how the he Chaco structures were used, the reading...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were used as a residence; owing it seems to the apartment buildings at Taos. Conv...
^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...ms to the apartment buildings at Taos. Conversely with the passage, the listening explain...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'conversely', 'first', 'firstly', 'hence', 'may', 'nevertheless', 'second', 'secondly', 'therefore', 'third', 'thirdly', 'thus', 'in spite of']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.22641509434 0.261695866417 87% => OK
Verbs: 0.212264150943 0.158904122519 134% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0471698113208 0.0723426182421 65% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0754716981132 0.0435111971325 173% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0188679245283 0.0277247811725 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108490566038 0.128828473217 84% => OK
Participles: 0.0707547169811 0.0370669169778 191% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.79596822273 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0424528301887 0.0208969081088 203% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00471698113208 0.00154638098197 305% => OK
Determiners: 0.122641509434 0.128158765124 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00471698113208 0.0158828679856 30% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00943396226415 0.0114777025283 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1166.0 1645.83664459 71% => OK
No of words: 187.0 271.125827815 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.23529411765 6.08160592843 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 4.04852973271 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.374331550802 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.304812834225 0.287516216867 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.235294117647 0.187439937562 126% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155080213904 0.113142543107 137% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79596822273 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604278074866 0.539623497131 112% => OK
Word variations: 56.9002152178 53.8517498576 106% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 18.7 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5746208573 49.3711431718 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.6 132.220823453 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 21.7502111507 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.4 0.878197800319 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 49.1812834225 50.5018328374 97% => OK
Elegance: 1.32307692308 1.90840788429 69% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.561442152495 0.549887131256 102% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.14077344222 0.142949733639 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0948348727713 0.0787303798458 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.66473981233 0.631733273073 105% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.156693758053 0.139662658121 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.273583586729 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839737050956 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.36920281455 0.414875509568 89% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0618935973593 0.0530846634433 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.395973505228 0.40443939384 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0701996079493 0.0528353158467 133% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.62251655629 28% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 7.0 10.2958057395 68% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.