tpo 12
The reading states that the subject of a portrait is Jane Austin and provide three reasons of support. However, the professor claims that the reasons of the Article is not convincing and refutes each of the reasons.
First, the reading states that Austin's family recognized her in the portrait and it shows that the subject of the portrait is her. the professor opposes this point by saying that Austin family recognize Austin's portrait 70 years after her death. her family had never seen her alive in that age. Accordingly, this evidence cannot prove that the subject of the portrait is Austin or not.
Second, the article states that the face of the subject in the portrait is similar to Cassandra's sketch. However, the professor believes that Austin had several female teenage cousins that could be subject of Cassandra's sketch. The professor mentions that actually it is accepted that the subject of the portrait is Marry Caumpin who was a distant niece of Cassandra.
Third, the reading avers that even though the painting has not any date, there is evidence that it was painted when Austin was a teenager. The professor refutes this point by saying that the black canvas that was used in the portrait was for William Lag and when William started his job Autin was 27 years old. As a result, the canvas used for portrait clarifies the fact that Austin was older than the girl depicted on the portrait.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The reading states that the subject of a portrait is Jane Austin and provide thre...
^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...hat the subject of the portrait is her. the professor opposes this point by saying ...
^^^
Line 4, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Her
...tins portrait 70 years after her death. her family had never seen her alive in that...
^^^
Line 6, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch. However, the professor believes that Austin had several female teenage cousin...
^^
Line 6, column 318, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'married'.
Suggestion: Married
...ted that the subject of the portrait is Marry Caumpin who was a distant niece of Cass...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, first, however, if, second, so, third, as for, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1176.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85950413223 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30565182233 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 145.348785872 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.462809917355 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.7976658005 49.2860985944 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06452816374 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260414104282 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113684382938 0.0996497079465 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485273665801 0.0662205650399 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157479045487 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499698981989 0.0443174109184 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 63.6247240618 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.