The reading claims that salvage logging is beneficial both to a damaged forest and to the economy. The professor disagrees with this claim by saying that it may appear that it is recovering the forest but in fact, it makes serious longer-term damages and refutes each point that the reading makes.
First, the reading states that if the trees are not removed after a devastating fire, forests will be choked with dead trees. The professor refutes this statement by saying that cleaning the trees from the jungle will not result in making too much space for other trees to grow. Moreover, he explains that if the trees remain there, they will decompose there and transform the soil of the environment to an enrich and nutrient soil, which is beneficiary for the plants to grow in this ground.
Second, the article claims that decaying wood will produce many insects, which can damage live and healthy spruce trees. The professor agrees that decaying wood will increase the number of insects. However, he does not agree with the damage is caused by bark beetle because this creature does not damage the trees. She explains that not salvaging trees will result in more birds and other insects, and it will enhance the life quality of the forest.
Finally, the reading states that the salvaging has economic benefits and will makes jobs. The professor refutes the statement by saying that the beneficial situation will not last much longer. The professor also illustrates that for salvaging, local residents cannot do so much work because they need expansive machines and vehicles for example helicopters to be able to lift heavy logging.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ransform the soil of the environment to an enrich and nutrient soil, which is beneficiary...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...alvaging has economic benefits and will makes jobs. The professor refutes the stateme...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1373.03311258 100% => OK
No of words: 274.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00729927007 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33465986562 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529197080292 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7111732474 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06452816374 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375510010482 0.272083759551 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139977427446 0.0996497079465 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735484026444 0.0662205650399 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212598648102 0.162205337803 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503772610791 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 63.6247240618 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.