The reading and the lecture both discuss salvage logging which is removing of the dead trees after a natural catastrophe. The author of the reading believes that salvage logging had lots of advantages for economy and jungles. The lecturer cast doubt on the claims made in the reading. He thinks that salvage logging has adverse long term environmental effects and also it is not beneficial for the economy as mentioned in the reading.
To begin with, the author of the passage pushes forth the idea that cramped tree after a wildfire would not allow other tree to grow up. It is mentioned that salvage logging replace the dead trees and make enough room for new generation to build up there. In the lecture the professor has completely different attitude towards this point. She asserts that decomposing of the dead trees will enrich the sand which can provide nutrition for new trees to grow up, so salvage logging will deprive the sand of nutrition which are vital for sand.
Furthermore, the reading passage contends that by cleaning dead trees most of insects which cause massive damage to trees would disappear. It notes that the infection due to insects decreases significantly. While the lecturer believes that not only the removed insects are not all harmful but also almost of them are beneficial for the environment. She says that dead trees are also the habitats for birds which salvage logging remove them and endanger its life.
Finally, the reading states that salvage logging brings the society appreciable economical benefits and would make lots of job due to massive need of workers. This point is challenged by the professor he claims that economy will benefit small amount because such tools which carry and move dead trees are expensive to be used. She says that increased demand of worker is temporary and will not last long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... of advantages for economy and jungles. The lecturer cast doubt on the claims made ...
^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the insects') or simply say ''most insects''.
Suggestion: most of the insects; most insects
...ge contends that by cleaning dead trees most of insects which cause massive damage to trees wou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 81, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... logging brings the society appreciable economical benefits and would make lots of job due...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 116, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun job seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of jobs'.
Suggestion: lots of jobs
...able economical benefits and would make lots of job due to massive need of workers. This po...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, so, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95498392283 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42073288171 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498392282958 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 473.4 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5650388593 49.2860985944 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 21.698381199 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.06452816374 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361454900012 0.272083759551 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124879151124 0.0996497079465 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878961948516 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230134805242 0.162205337803 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062012866421 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.