TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful

Essay topics:

TPO-15 - Integrated Writing Task The cane toad is a large (1.8 kg) amphibian species native to Central and South America. It was deliberately introduced to Australia in 1935 with the expectation that it would protect farmers' crops by eating harmful insec

The article states that their are several majors proposed to stop the spread of the cane toad in austrelia. However, the author claims that it is difficult to get rid of toads and the proposed measures can be unsuccessful and refutes all the authors reasons mention in the article.

First, The article states that a way use to prevent toad would be to build national fence. The speaker opposes the point by saying that it would not be an effective approach to prevent toads. The speaker states that the national fence are build near the streams where the water flows. due to flow, the toads would not be affected much and only few toads could be prevented.

Second, The reading posits that the toads could captured and destroyed by volunteers. The speaker does not sound it convincing and he states that the volunteers are untrained about the toad prevention. due to their lack of knowledge, they can harm the other species like frog present in water streams.

Third, The article says that researchers are developing disease-causing virus to control toad population. Again, The speaker disagrees with the point by saying that it may cause economical disasters. he gives an example of the situation created bfore in southa america abot the same issue and the infection virus was developed in that area.

To sum up, The author and speaker holds conflicting views about prevention of toad. it is clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on the given issue.

Votes
Average: 8.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
The article states that their are several majors proposed to stop the...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... First, The article states that a way use to prevent toad would be to build natio...
^^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...near the streams where the water flows. due to flow, the toads would not be affecte...
^^^
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'capture'
Suggestion: capture
...The reading posits that the toads could captured and destroyed by volunteers. The speake...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 203, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Due
...re untrained about the toad prevention. due to their lack of knowledge, they can ha...
^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...that it may cause economical disasters. he gives an example of the situation creat...
^^
Line 9, column 85, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...licting views about prevention of toad. it is clear that they will have trouble fi...
^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lear that they will have trouble finding common ground on the given issue.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, so, third, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 22.412803532 98% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1373.03311258 89% => OK
No of words: 250.0 270.72406181 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.908 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47717581128 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 419.366225166 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2470280106 49.2860985944 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6428571429 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 7.06452816374 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405804568654 0.272083759551 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133742697449 0.0996497079465 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082406459056 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200167932419 0.162205337803 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0598540236372 0.0443174109184 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 53.8541721854 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.2367328918 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.