The reading passage contends that there are several measures that been proposed to prevent the spread of the cane toad in Australia, a large amphibian species native to Central and South America, which makes small native animals being threatened. On the other hand, the lecturer brings about several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the lecturer questions the measure in the reading passage suggested that building a national fence would prevent the spread of the toad. This is attributed to the fact that the eggs of the toad have laid on near river and stream. It makes them to carry out through other sides in Australia. Even a national fence is built, the spread would not be protected. Thus, the reading passage’s first point is invalid.
Moreover, the lecturer casts doubt on the measure made in the reading passage that volunteers are capable to capture and destroy the toads. This is because it is true that they are able to capture and destroy the toads. However, untrained volunteers also would capture and destroy native species, which makes original habitats being damaged. Consequently, the reading passage’s second point is contradicted.
Last but not least, the lecturer disagrees with the measure made by the reading passage that a disease which is developing by researchers and cause virus is able to control the toad populations. It is obvious that it would cause terrible situations all over the habitats because the virus would be transferred and other species also are damaged by the virus. For example, in South America, many researchers had applied the virus like this. However, this virus made original habitats devastated and native species there declined. Eventually, their whole ecology did damaged by the virus. As a result, with the reasoning, the reading passage’s final proposed measure is refuted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 565, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'damage'
Suggestion: damage
...ed. Eventually, their whole ecology did damaged by the virus. As a result, with the rea...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'for example', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'it is true', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.242774566474 0.261695866417 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.184971098266 0.158904122519 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0895953757225 0.0723426182421 124% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0375722543353 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0202312138728 0.0277247811725 73% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0982658959538 0.128828473217 76% => OK
Participles: 0.0635838150289 0.0370669169778 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64649873523 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0202312138728 0.0208969081088 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0028901734104 0.00154638098197 187% => OK
Determiners: 0.124277456647 0.128158765124 97% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.014450867052 0.0158828679856 91% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.014450867052 0.0114777025283 126% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1866.0 1645.83664459 113% => OK
No of words: 300.0 271.125827815 111% => OK
Chars per words: 6.22 6.08160592843 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.383333333333 0.374372842146 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.33 0.287516216867 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.186666666667 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.1 0.113142543107 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64649873523 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473333333333 0.539623497131 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 46.2894255555 53.8517498576 86% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0529801325 130% => OK
Sentence length: 17.6470588235 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9716451838 49.3711431718 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.764705882 132.220823453 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6470588235 21.7502111507 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.823529411765 0.878197800319 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 50.6470588235 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 1.66666666667 1.90840788429 87% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.664759661361 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.127099574625 0.142949733639 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0987496765019 0.0787303798458 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546500658724 0.631733273073 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.180563585893 0.139662658121 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.275232293764 0.266732575781 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.152074636274 0.103435571967 147% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.477242512262 0.414875509568 115% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.00949422379733 0.0530846634433 18% => Paragraphs are so close to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.513161017116 0.40443939384 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0536480446072 0.0528353158467 102% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 4.45695364238 247% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 8.0 3.62251655629 221% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.2958057395 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.