The reader claims three possible ways to control the overgrowth of the Cane toad, is a large species innate to America introduce to Australia to support the farmer and provides reasons to support his arguments. On the other hand, the professor counters these specific points and present clues to call into the information in the passage. He says all of the suggestions are unsuccessful and have some weaknesses.
First, the reader discusses the build a bolder to control the spread of the toad to another area, conversely, the speaker casts doubt on this point by explaining the fence is ineffective because the young toads and the eggs are easily scuttering by the stream. So, this idea cannot stop the spread out of the toad even the fence is present.
Second, the reader states the destruction of the Cane toad by volunteers, however, the speaker argues this by telling that the Volunteers are professional and can not distinguish the Native American toad from Australian one, so this may lead to the damage to the ecosystem.
Third, the reader says the opinion of the diseases causes the virus in the toad. Also, the professor encounters that by telling this is bad though because the viruses can spread the diseases in the American and Australian toad together and that will intimidate the decline in both species. So all the ecosystem will suffer.
Essay evaluation report
The reader claims three possible ways to control the overgrowth of the Cane toad, is a large species innate to
The reader claims three possible ways to control the overgrowth of the Cane toad, which is a large species innate to
First, the reader discusses the build a bolder to control the spread of the toad to another area,
First, the reader discusses building a bolder to control the spread of the toad to another area,
the Volunteers are professional
the Volunteers are not professional
flaws:
No. of Words: 229 250
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 21 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 12
No. of Words: 229 250
No. of Characters: 1101 1200
No. of Different Words: 122 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.89 4.2
Average Word Length: 4.808 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.549 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 80 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 57 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 35 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.444 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 13.769 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.405 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.662 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.108 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 347, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the information in the passage. He says all of the suggestions are unsuccessful and have s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ad even the fence is present. Second, the reader states the destruction of the...
^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...istinguish the Native American toad from Australian one, so this may lead to the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 12.0772626932 25% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1130.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 229.0 270.72406181 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93449781659 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61227364731 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 145.348785872 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545851528384 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 343.8 419.366225166 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 84.8659073022 49.2860985944 172% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.555555556 110.228320801 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 21.698381199 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06452816374 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380003688102 0.272083759551 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143396346067 0.0996497079465 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082421659726 0.0662205650399 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223772165512 0.162205337803 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392791286222 0.0443174109184 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 63.6247240618 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.