The reading and the lecture are both about archaelogy in The United Kingdom. The author of reading belives that archaelogiest struggling with the several limitation therefore it brings about some problem for researchs and exavation. The lecturer cast doubt on the claim made in the article. She think that these arguments does not reflect the fact that.
First of all, the author points out that many valuable artifacts were lost to construction project especially because of growing populations. Therefore, it did not preserve the artifacts. This point is challanged by the lecturer. She says that before exavation archaelogiest make plan to preserve construction. Furthermore, she argues that they aware of this situation therefore they behave very carefully.
Secondly,the author contends that archaelologist do not have enough financial support to continue their work. They are just supported by goverment. The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggest that support is not given by goverment, it is given by construction company. She eleborates this by mentioning that these companies support all part of research and cary out with much more great range than before.
Finally, the author states that archaelogist have career in the future because there is not sufficient job to apply just universities and a few goverment agencies hire them. The lecturer, on the other hand, posist that they work all stages of the project like planing therefore goverment and universities need more arhaelogists. She eleborates this by mentioning that they are paid much more money than before and employment rate is on the highest point right now.
In conclusion, the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the reading.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun limitation seems to be countable; consider using: 'several limitations'.
Suggestion: several limitations
... that archaelogiest struggling with the several limitation therefore it brings about some problem ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n therefore it brings about some problem for researchs and exavation. The lecture...
^^
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e problem for researchs and exavation. The lecturer cast doubt on the claim made i...
^^^
Line 1, column 297, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
...t on the claim made in the article. She think that these arguments does not reflect t...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , the
... they behave very carefully. Secondly,the author contends that archaelologist do ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ist do not have enough financial support to continue their work. They are just su...
^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... The lecturer rebuts this argument. She suggest that support is not given by goverment,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 410, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey are paid much more money than before and employment rate is on the highest p...
^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re paid much more money than before and employment rate is on the highest point ...
^^
Line 9, column 56, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...the lecturer effectively casts doubt on all of the claims and theories presented in the re...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 5.04856512141 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 22.412803532 156% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1373.03311258 108% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41090909091 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89123154291 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570909090909 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 419.366225166 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.0754473798 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.6666666667 110.228320801 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2777777778 21.698381199 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06452816374 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 4.19205298013 239% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121949515759 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0364151288935 0.0996497079465 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408180185472 0.0662205650399 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0613615711769 0.162205337803 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390249487549 0.0443174109184 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.