TPO-17 - Integrated Writing Task In the past century, the steady growth of the human population and the corresponding increase in agriculture and pesticide use have caused much harm to wildlife in the United States,birds in particular. Unfortunately for b
The reading passage states that because of the increase in the human population and also the subsequent growth in agriculture and pesticides implementation, wildlife has damaged in the United States. Mainly, birds influenced the most among other species, and if this trend continues, the number of birds eventually will decline. The passage provides three reasons for supporting this idea. However, the lecturer casts serious doubts on this claim and believes that none of these reasons are convincing enough and refutes all the reasons.
First, the reading declares that because of the growth of the human population, natural habitats of birds will soon disappear. The professor, on the other hand, disagrees and makes the argument that birds will have larger habitat and this may increase their population. She comments that the population of some birds may shrink, but most others will find more place to live and also hunt.
Second, although the reading posits that the increase of the agricultural activities will result in the further destruction of birds habitat, the lecturer says that there are some new attempts to change this problem. As there is progress for using less land for agriculture, some plants that produce more food were discovered and introduced to rural sites. Consequently, there is no need for destroying the traditional areas that birds might live.
Third, the reading passage asserts that chemical pesticides can harm birds because they might eat poisoned insects or drink contaminated water. Nonetheless, the professor thinks that people are aware of the consequences of using the pesticides and they made some changes to solve this problem. In fact, they tried to develop less toxic pesticides, and also pest resistant crops to overcome this matter.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nonetheless, second, so, third, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 22.412803532 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 282.0 270.72406181 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64023226576 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567375886525 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1410739331 49.2860985944 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.692307692 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 21.698381199 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460854347773 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153635003493 0.0996497079465 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913683068669 0.0662205650399 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265120837226 0.162205337803 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503077136218 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.8541721854 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.