The article states birds populations will continue to decline and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor states that the author's claim about birds populations is true but she refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the reading avers that since human populations and settlements continue to exapndbirds habitats will continue to disapear as well. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this point is true but only for some birds species. She explains that building, housing areas are better habitat for large species of birds, such as pigions, hawks, and so on. Therefore, birds populations has increased with housing developments. The professor conculdes the decline in birds populations is not uniform as the author would like us to believe, but only on small birds species.
Second, the article claims that the growth of agricultura, as response to growing health populations, will also result in the further destruction of birds habitats. Conversely, the professor disagree with point by stating that the increase in agricultual activities are done by using less lands. The agriculte growth has already increased by inroducing of increased variety crops, so there is no need to convert and use wilderness areas for agricultural purpose.
Third, the reading posits that chemical pesticides gets into the water and into the food chains for birds where they can harm birds. Even they do not kill them, they effect their reproduction process. The professor refutes this point by saying that pesticides have been developed and will continue to do so in the future. This new pesticides differ from that in the past in two disntictive features: The first one, new productions of pesticides are less much toxic than before. Also, new forms to faciliate growing pesticides that resistant to pests, in addition to, become less harm to birds species.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'birds'' or 'bird's'?
Suggestion: birds'; bird's
...at this point is true but only for some birds species. She explains that building, ho...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...gricultual activities are done by using less lands. The agriculte growth has already...
^^^^
Line 7, column 415, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two disntictive features: The first one, new productions of pesticides are less m...
^^
Line 7, column 589, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...ts, in addition to, become less harm to birds species.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, well, as for, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28666666667 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69675525194 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8998269891 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.733333333 110.228320801 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.510478251665 0.272083759551 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15595047848 0.0996497079465 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689716880104 0.0662205650399 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281075945262 0.162205337803 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375439063496 0.0443174109184 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.