The article states that birds populations will continue to decline and provides three reasons of supports. However, the professor refutes each of the author’s reasons.
First, the reading avers that since human populations and settlements continue to expand, birds natural habitats are going to continue vanish. The professor, on the other hand, explains that this point is true but only for some types of birds. She explains that building, housing areas are better habitats for large species of birds, such as seagulls, pigeons, hawks, falcons and so on. And thus, the decline in birds populations is not going to be uniform in the future, as the author would like us to believe, but some populations may shrink.
Second, the article claims that the growth of agriculture, as s result to growing health populations, will also result in the further destruction of birds habitats. Conversely, the professor disagree with this point by stating that expansion of agricultural activities are done by using less lands. The agriculture growth has already increased by introducing of more productive varieties of crops. In fact, these crops produce more food per unit of area, so there is no need to convert and use wilderness areas for agricultural purpose.
Third, the reading posits that chemical pesticides get into the water and the food chains for birds where they can harm birds. Even if pesticides do not kill them, they affect their reproduction process. The professor refutes this point by saying people are aware of dangerous of tradition pesticides . Therefore, pesticides have been developed and will continue to do so in the future. This new pesticides differ from that in the past in two distinctive features: First, new and less toxic than before . Also, development of more pest resistant crops that become less attractive to pests. Consequently, people will reduce the need for chemical pesticides. Moreover, these genetically modified crops are less harm to birds species which is pretty important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article states that birds populations will continue to decli...
^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions and settlements continue to expand, birds natural habitats are going to cont...
^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s populations is not going to be uniform in the future, as the author would like ...
^^
Line 5, column 288, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun lands is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ricultural activities are done by using less lands. The agriculture growth has alrea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g of more productive varieties of crops. In fact, these crops produce more food p...
^^
Line 7, column 301, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...are of dangerous of tradition pesticides . Therefore, pesticides have been develo...
^^
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous of tradition pesticides . Therefore, pesticides have been developed and will ...
^^
Line 7, column 481, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...two distinctive features: First, new and less toxic than before . Also, developme...
^^
Line 7, column 505, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...: First, new and less toxic than before . Also, development of more pest resista...
^^
Line 7, column 528, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...toxic than before . Also, development of more pest resistant crops that become le...
^^
Line 7, column 721, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'bird'.
Suggestion: bird
...tically modified crops are less harm to birds species which is pretty important.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, therefore, third, thus, as for, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1737.0 1373.03311258 127% => OK
No of words: 311.0 270.72406181 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58520900322 5.08290768461 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22639417452 2.5805825403 125% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 145.348785872 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604501607717 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5757212684 49.2860985944 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.176470588 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2941176471 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.88235294118 7.06452816374 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 4.19205298013 262% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.524319640465 0.272083759551 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136979580561 0.0996497079465 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888857420846 0.0662205650399 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273822795629 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635053757305 0.0443174109184 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.3589403974 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.8541721854 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.2367328918 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 63.6247240618 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.