The reading states that there are three possible solutions to save Torreya taxifoha trees in Florida and provides three reasons to support these suggestions. However, the lecturer explains that these solutions are not suitable enough to be a success and refutes each of the author's suggestion.
First of all, the reading claims the microclimate in Florida would be an appropriate place to reestablish these trees. However, the professor counters this point by saying that this climate has been affected by global warming so, the environmental conditions have become drier than before. So this solution is not successful.
Secondly, the article mentions that transforming the trees' habitat to a new location like forests might preserve these trees. However, the lecturer opposes this point by saying this idea might put other trees species in danger. He clarifies through an example that the trees may breed so quickly and compete for other native species of trees in forests. So this assisted migration has unpredictable effects.
Thirdly, the reading claims that growing the Torreya in research laboratories would save them. However, the professor rejects this point by saying these trees would not survive in these centers. He says the trees need to grow in a large environment and that would not be available in the laboratory.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 275, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...to be a success and refutes each of the authors suggestion. First of all, the reading ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
... article mentions that transforming the trees habitat to a new location like forests ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1373.03311258 82% => OK
No of words: 212.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29245283019 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66635885847 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 145.348785872 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551886792453 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 333.0 419.366225166 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8721514907 49.2860985944 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 110.228320801 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 21.698381199 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06452816374 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185176418668 0.272083759551 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698679689709 0.0996497079465 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420800222846 0.0662205650399 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117340652941 0.162205337803 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0277752357701 0.0443174109184 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.3589403974 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.8541721854 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.