In this set of the materials, the author of the reading passage expresses that three disadvantages of "let it burn" policy caused problems in Yellowstone. However, the professor thinks that the author's theories contain some defects.
First of all, the author states that Yellowstone fire caused considerable damage to the park's trees and other vegetation. On the contrary, the professor indicates that the vegetation land which had been scorched is colonized by new plants. It created new opportunities and diversities for certain plants to grow up. For example, some small plants couldn't grow under shadow until forest fire in 1988.
In addition, the author claims that park wildlife was affected ,and destruction of habitats and the disruption of food chains would may impossible to return. However, the professor asserts that some damange already recovered. Because some certain plants grow up and create new opportunities for some species to habitate such us rabbits. Furthermore, it trive predetories food sources and create strong food chain.
Finally, the author raises the point that Yellowstone fires had negative consequences for tourist attraction to stay away. On the other hand, the professor refutes that the author by proposing that the fire was unusual; furthermore, in 1989, there is low rainfall and dry season happened. Hence, the tourist recovered in the next year after this happened.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...grow up. For example, some small plants couldnt grow under shadow until forest fire in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...r claims that park wildlife was affected ,and destruction of habitats and the disr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, for example, in addition, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47727272727 5.08290768461 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7925927702 2.5805825403 108% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.595454545455 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 357.3 419.366225166 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4951450968 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 21.698381199 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06452816374 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262356726721 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859644234452 0.0996497079465 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701851814126 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148142762676 0.162205337803 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056286173465 0.0443174109184 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.2367328918 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.