The reading and the lecture are discussing the genetically modified trees. The reading suggests they are have many advantages, however, the professor casts doubt on all of them as follows.
First, the author of the reading claims that the genetically modified trees survive more than the natural ones because they could be modified to be resistant to disease. He supports this argument by mentioning an example about the papaya tress. On the other hand, the speaker refutes this supposition by saying that the genetically modified tress are uniformed which means they are identical. As a result if any one tree failed to resist any environment factor like disease, or climate change, that would lead to the eradication of the whole trees since they do not have the diversity that is found in natural trees.
Second, the text contends that the genetically modified trees have more economic benefits than the natural tress, because they grow faster and give more yields. The lecturer, in contrast, draws attention to the fact that the companies that produce these tress have hidden motives, mainly economic motives. She elaborated this point by stating that the farmers have to pay for the company every time they grow these tree. That is according to the laws, which means that there will not be more profits as the reading claims.
Third, the reading argues that these genetically modified trees are a good solution to the problem of overexploitation of wild trees which are being cut down faster than they grows. The professor goes against this claim by mentioning that the modified trees will be strong competitor for the natural resources. They could completely wipe out all the wild trees since wild trees would not have the same ability to benefit form the natural resources.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
...ed trees. The reading suggests they are have many advantages, however, the professor...
^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...eans they are identical. As a result if any one tree failed to resist any environment f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 249, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this tress' or 'these tresses'?
Suggestion: this tress; these tresses
...he fact that the companies that produce these tress have hidden motives, mainly economic mo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'grow'
Suggestion: grow
...ich are being cut down faster than they grows. The professor goes against this claim ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1373.03311258 109% => OK
No of words: 295.0 270.72406181 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06779661017 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47275530865 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51186440678 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.9 419.366225166 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6053309235 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 110.228320801 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.06452816374 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458393807761 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17375201557 0.0996497079465 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117450130833 0.0662205650399 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283388037449 0.162205337803 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869485646022 0.0443174109184 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.