The reading posits that the Little Ice Age were caused by several possible issues. The author provides some reasons for each of causing items. On the other hand, the professor claims that scientists have recently got new information by which the reading's ideas were seemed out of date and he refutes each of the reasons provided in reading passage.
First, the reading states that large ocean current, Gulf Stream, disruption contributed to the climate cooling in in all around the world during the Little Ice Age. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that current’s disrupting is in charge of climate cooling in northern hemisphere not the whole parts of the earth. For instance, neither New Zealand nor South Africa area were affected by Gulf Stream did they have experienced the Little Ice Age.
Second, the reading claims that several volcanic eruptions could have emitted dark clouds of dust and sulfur gas into the air by which the sunlight were blocked from reaching Earth's surface. This phenomenon would probably responsible to decrease the global temperatures. Yet, the professor casts doubt about this claim by saying that that is true that a lot of volcanic eruption took place during that time; however, they were not strong enough to cause such a freezing, low temperature.
Third, the reading posits that the forests became abundant just before the Little Ice Age. Since the trees take the carbon dioxide of the air and the carbon dioxide is a major factor in Green House effect which leads to increase the global temperature. Therefore, they contributed indirectly to the cooling of the climate. In contrast, the professor refutes this point. The professor explains that mentioned phenomenon had not enough time to cause long term climate cooling effect. Since the population grew again in a short time, the forests got cut in order to produce food and crops for population.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
...tion contributed to the climate cooling in in all around the world during the Little ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'therefore', 'third', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.301724137931 0.261695866417 115% => OK
Verbs: 0.149425287356 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0747126436782 0.0723426182421 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0373563218391 0.0435111971325 86% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0114942528736 0.0277247811725 41% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135057471264 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0402298850575 0.0370669169778 109% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46976318949 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201149425287 0.0208969081088 96% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.137931034483 0.128158765124 108% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00574712643678 0.0158828679856 36% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00862068965517 0.0114777025283 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1917.0 1645.83664459 116% => OK
No of words: 314.0 271.125827815 116% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1050955414 6.08160592843 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.04852973271 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.394904458599 0.374372842146 105% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270700636943 0.287516216867 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.165605095541 0.187439937562 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0923566878981 0.113142543107 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46976318949 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 145.348785872 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550955414013 0.539623497131 102% => OK
Word variations: 58.2802867634 53.8517498576 108% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.9333333333 21.7502111507 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5256532474 49.3711431718 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 21.7502111507 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.878197800319 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 48.0033970276 50.5018328374 95% => OK
Elegance: 2.40579710145 1.90840788429 126% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.694482132976 0.549887131256 126% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0963612622308 0.142949733639 67% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0621091796433 0.0787303798458 79% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.599455955524 0.631733273073 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134561563555 0.139662658121 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.3252577454 0.266732575781 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113124302764 0.103435571967 109% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.412650980209 0.414875509568 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0537360696997 0.0530846634433 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.522068212358 0.40443939384 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546800889071 0.0528353158467 103% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.26048565121 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.62251655629 110% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 3.1766004415 189% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.