The reading and the lecture are discussing the little ice age, which was a period of time of unusually cold temperature in the past. The reading provides three possible reasons for this period, but the lecture casts doubts on these reasons as follows.
Firstly, the author of the reading argues that disruption of the ocean currents is one possible reason. The lecturer, on other hand, refutes this claim by mentioning that if this hypothesis was true, it would affect only the north of America and Europe. He added that does not explain why other areas, like Africa, were affected.
Secondly, the article states that another possible reason is the volcanoes. The erupting of these volcanoes could have caused a large amount of gases and dust that blocked the sun light, which resulted in the cold temperature. The professor, on the other hand, rebuts this claim by elaborating that if it was the volcanoes'effect , it would cause striking and unusual phenomena, like the colorful ice and sun. We do not have any accounts that supports the existence of any unusual occurrence during this time.
Thirdly, the text contends that the reason could be the effect of the forest tress and human activity that eradicated this green plants . this would finally cause the earth climate to stay warmer. The professor, in contrast, rejects this claim. He says that it is unlikely to be the reason because even with cutting the trees, it starts growing quickly, which means that there is no enough time to cause the green house effect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...cussing the little ice age, which was a period of time of unusually cold temperature in the pa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on these reasons as follows. Firstly, the author of the reading argues that di...
^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...turer, on other hand, refutes this claim by mentioning that if this hypothesis wa...
^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ating that if it was the volcanoeseffect , it would cause striking and unusual ph...
^^
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was the volcanoeseffect , it would cause striking and unusual phenomena, like the...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...the forest tress and human activity that eradicated this green plants . this woul...
^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ivity that eradicated this green plants . this would finally cause the earth clim...
^^
Line 7, column 140, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ty that eradicated this green plants . this would finally cause the earth climate t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 257.0 270.72406181 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94941634241 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42912688309 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583657587549 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.68641678 49.2860985944 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8461538462 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284267116192 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904950177364 0.0996497079465 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706134551342 0.0662205650399 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159386904568 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607374841647 0.0443174109184 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.