The reading passage states three potential causes of the Little Ice Age, whereas the professor points out that the information in reading is out of date and scientists now do not think they are account for the Little Ice Age.
Firstly, the author insists that before the climate event there was a short period of warm weather and during that time the glaciers melted, which send abysmal freshwater into the Gulf Stream, therefore, the disruption of the ocean currents lead to the temperature decrease. The professor, however, argues that the Gulf Stream only affect Europe and America while the cooling of climate also happened in other regions such as, New Zealand. As a result, the disruption of ocean currents cannot cause the Little Ice Age.
Secondly, the reading says that the temperature decline may attribute to the volcanic eruptions which would release dusk and gas that block the sun light. In contrast, the speaker reckons that indeed the eruptions can lead to the Little Ice Age. Nevertheless, if there was signifiant volcanic eruptions, individuals in other places would see some extraordinary phenomenon such as , colorful sunset or snow in brown. Since there were not records for that, the eruptions should not be strong enough to cause the climate change.
Lastly, the reading states that thanks to the decrease of human population in that period lead to the forest trees thrived, which absorbed a large amount of greenhouse gas, is responsible for the climate change. On the contrary, the lecture deems that the time was not long enough to cause the change. Because the human population grew back quickly and they needed more land to feed increasing people. In this way, the trees' number declined and cannot account for the Little Ice Age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ee some extraordinary phenomenon such as , colorful sunset or snow in brown. Since...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, while, in contrast, such as, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 292.0 270.72406181 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04794520548 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.04702891845 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45573041849 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554794520548 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.2978397164 49.2860985944 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.833333333 110.228320801 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06452816374 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435196166193 0.272083759551 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150040578087 0.0996497079465 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0876652177685 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249039488922 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251219457668 0.0443174109184 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.7273730684 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.