The lecture apparently disproves what is argued in the reading material. According to the passage, scientists mention some causes that are reasponsible for the Little Ice Age. The professor talks about the same issue. However, he thinks none of these reasons make sence. Then he gives several evidences to demonstrate his statement.
For one thing, while the passage mentions that cooling may have been caused by the disruption of Gulf Stream due to the melted glaciers, the professor rebuts this by saying that this reason is out of date. Because the melted glaciers can only affect Europen and America. However, actually harf of the earth's temperature declines, including South Africa.
Moreover, contrary to the claim that volcanic eruption could have caused the Little Ice Age, the professor insists that because eruption on that level can cause sunlight blocked by the ash, snow turnning to gray, there will be some records indicate these changes. However, no reports have been found yet, so the volcanic eruption cannot create large enough gas or ash into atmosphere which decreases the global temperatures.
Finally, the passage argues that greenhouse gas decreasing plays a role in the Little Ice Age. And the professor disagrees the idea by saying that there is just not enough time for the cause to make influences on the climate change. Because human population grows fast, the forests have to be cut down for agriculture. Then the carbon dioxide level in the atmoshpere will raise again. This cannot explain the long period of the Little Ice Age.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earths'' or 'earth's'?
Suggestion: earths'; earth's
... America. However, actually harf of the earths temperature declines, including South A...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'apparently', 'but', 'finally', 'however', 'may', 'moreover', 'so', 'then', 'while', 'for one thing']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.276223776224 0.261695866417 106% => OK
Verbs: 0.157342657343 0.158904122519 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0559440559441 0.0723426182421 77% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0629370629371 0.0435111971325 145% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0104895104895 0.0277247811725 38% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111888111888 0.128828473217 87% => OK
Participles: 0.048951048951 0.0370669169778 132% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.46015225068 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244755244755 0.0208969081088 117% => OK
Particles: 0.0034965034965 0.00154638098197 226% => OK
Determiners: 0.136363636364 0.128158765124 106% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.027972027972 0.0158828679856 176% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0104895104895 0.0114777025283 91% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1564.0 1645.83664459 95% => OK
No of words: 255.0 271.125827815 94% => OK
Chars per words: 6.13333333333 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.04852973271 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396078431373 0.374372842146 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274509803922 0.287516216867 95% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188235294118 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.113725490196 0.113142543107 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46015225068 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.539623497131 113% => OK
Word variations: 65.2164043633 53.8517498576 121% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0529801325 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7809911805 49.3711431718 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.266666667 132.220823453 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 21.7502111507 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.733333333333 0.878197800319 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.39072847682 29% => OK
Readability: 44.4509803922 50.5018328374 88% => OK
Elegance: 1.89393939394 1.90840788429 99% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.666386985115 0.549887131256 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0705898080051 0.142949733639 49% => Sentence sentence coherence is low.
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0464316737105 0.0787303798458 59% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.546095927751 0.631733273073 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.160275374641 0.139662658121 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.276529447604 0.266732575781 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136328845684 0.103435571967 132% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.384487081866 0.414875509568 93% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0646324514297 0.0530846634433 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.48429477783 0.40443939384 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597166799529 0.0528353158467 113% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.26048565121 188% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 0.0 3.49668874172 0% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 7.0 3.62251655629 193% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 3.1766004415 126% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.