The article states that Robert E. Peary reached the North pole on April 7, 1909 and provides three reasons of support. Conversely, the professor states that there is no solid evidence to prove Peary's claim and she refutes each of the author's reasons
First, the reading avers that the NAtional Geographic Society investigation revealed that Peary's records were consistent and persausive to support Peary's claim that he reached the North pole. However, the professor disagrees with this point by saying that even though the National Geographic committee did an investigation, it was not completely objective. For the reason that many memebers of this society were actually Peary's friends and some of them funded his trip. Also, the professor says that the invesigation lasting only 2 days and according to Peary's statement it did not examined all his evidences. Consequently, the professor concludes that the National geographic Society investigation is not trustworthy and did not prove that Peary was indeed reached the North Pole.
The reading claims that a recent expedition was done by an explorer named Tom Avery provides support for Peary’s claim that he reached the North pole In only 37 days. The professor, on the other hand, opposes this point by explaining the difference between Avery’s trip and once that done by Peray. First, She says that the sildes that had been used in both trips were the same,but the slides of Avery’s trip were less weight. For the reasons that Avery did not carry his food with him, it was actually dropped to him by airplane. And secondly, there was a favorable weather condition in Avery’ trip than it was in the Peary’s trip. As a resuly, the professor concludes that since these signifianct differences among those trips, it is so difficult to proof the claim of peary’s that he reached the North Pole.
Third, the reading posits that there are photgraphes have taken by Peary that support his claim. The professor refutes this point by saying that these photos did not prove anything. Since these photographs have been taken a hundred years ago, the camera used was fuzzy, and unfoucsed lens. In addition to, these photos became faded, fuzzy, and so hard to calculate shadows of sun. And therefore, the professor concludes that if we could not verify the accurate measurement of shadows of the sun in these photos, we could not compare to the position of the sun in the North Pole. And finally, these photographs are not a confident source to relay on it to suuport Peary’s claim.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'examine'
Suggestion: examine
...ccording to Pearys statement it did not examined all his evidences. Consequently, the pr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ary was indeed reached the North Pole. The reading claims that a recent expedit...
^^^
Line 5, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , but
...ad been used in both trips were the same,but the slides of Avery's trip were le...
^^^^
Line 7, column 376, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...zzy, and so hard to calculate shadows of sun. And therefore, the professor conclu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, conversely, finally, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.4613686534 172% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 12.0772626932 182% => OK
Pronoun: 53.0 22.412803532 236% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 30.3222958057 139% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.01324503311 239% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2144.0 1373.03311258 156% => OK
No of words: 424.0 270.72406181 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05660377358 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67573847035 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 145.348785872 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457547169811 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 419.366225166 156% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.51434878587 396% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 13.0662251656 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0796332118 49.2860985944 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.842105263 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3157894737 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.68421052632 7.06452816374 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.491372368889 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163451240988 0.0996497079465 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138979786124 0.0662205650399 210% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308991676233 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534961335753 0.0443174109184 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 63.6247240618 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.