TPO-28 - Integrated Writing Task Robert E. Peary was a well-known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole. When he returned from the expedition, he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7, 1909. This report made him

Both the reading material and the listening concentrate on whether Peary had reached the North Pole. Though the author offers three strong supports, the speaker disagree with all these reasons because they are not convince.

To begin with, the professor has a different view of the committee which the author thinks it’s declaring proves the truth. She points out that this committee is made of Peary’s friends and most of them offered lots of money for his travel. Moreover, this investigation just lasted two days which is too short to get a convincing result. So it cannot approve the truth of Peary’s travel.

Then, according to the passage, Tom Avery’s same trek can be powerful reason. On the contrary, the speaker disagrees with it for there are some obvious differences. For example, Avery contains less weight because his food is transported by airplane, not like Peary who has to contain lots of food. What’s more, the weather condition is also different.

In the end, the author asserts the photographs can be a powerful evidence. It is true that people use the shadows of photos to detect the locations, however, this technology requires the photos should be precise. As we all know, at Peary’s time, the photos are too blurred to calculate the accurate location. Thus, this is not reasonable at all.

Votes
Average: 6.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 215, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'convinced'.
Suggestion: convinced
... all these reasons because they are not convince. To begin with, the professor has a ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, for example, it is true, on the contrary, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12669683258 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73498626579 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656108597285 0.540411800872 121% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3536972835 49.2860985944 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9285714286 110.228320801 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7857142857 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227068851922 0.272083759551 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729765449347 0.0996497079465 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0704533827522 0.0662205650399 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132049957739 0.162205337803 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398150727449 0.0443174109184 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.3589403974 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.8541721854 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.0289183223 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.