TPO 30 - Integrated Writing Task
In this set materials, the reading passage state that the ancient Greeks people could not use a special weapon called a burning mirror; also, it brings tree reasons for this claim. On the other hand, the listening section brings into question the reading by providing different reasons (and examples).
First of all, the reading passage argues that the ancient Greeks did not have enough technology for making a big mirror for using as a weapon. In contrast, the lecture opposes this view by mentioning that the Greeks people did not use only a large mirror, but they used several small pieces of flat copper as the mirror.
Secondly, the reading passage indicates that the Greek army needed at least 10 minutes for burning Roman's ships; furthermore, Roman's ships must unmoved until they burned. Conversely, what the lecturer state is different. She points that Roman's ships not made just a wood, they made with another material such as waterproof. The between waterproof and wood, the ships had a piece which called pitch. The pitch burned quickly (in a second). After burning the bitch, all the wood was burned immediately.
Finally, according to the reading, the Greek army had another weapon that used better and easier than the mirror. However, the lecturer believes that the Roman army had information about Flaming arrows; therefore, they could save each other from this weapon. Conversely, the Roman army did not have information about a mirror, and they sow the only mirror, but suddenly their ships were buried. Hence, the weapon mirror is more useful than flaming
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-11 | PRACHI DAVE | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, in contrast, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06130268199 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30772870568 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.8300563006 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06452816374 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354462427367 0.272083759551 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12292448986 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663250242557 0.0662205650399 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209502174693 0.162205337803 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398822817551 0.0443174109184 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.42419426049 93% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.