The article claims that using an ingenious weapon which called a 'burning mirror' in the war between Romaninan and Greeks is just a myth and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor refutes the article and each of reasnons.
First, the author poses that Greeks, in the past were not technologically professional enough to make this weapon. However, the professor opposes that acient Greek was asdvanced because of meteculous mathematists who designed this device presicely. As a result, she says that mirrors were put along together aurately with a parabolic shape.
Second, the reading claims that, burning thing with a mirror takes a long time, let alone the mega bodies of ships. However, the professor refutes the author and says that in two ways Romanian ships could be burnt just in ten minutes:first, ships were made of wood which is able burn much easier than other materials and second, ships cuould burst into fire in one second because of an sticky material were used in that war.
Third, the article claims that, those days,soldiers could use flaming arrows instead of the patented wepeon. However, the professor says that, although the soldirs were vigor enough in using their acient weapon the power of mirror for destroying the ships were more significant and more effective than flaming arrows
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The article claims that using an ingenious weapon which called a burni...
^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...urst into fire in one second because of an sticky material were used in that war. ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sticky material were used in that war. Third, the article claims that, those da...
^^^
Line 7, column 43, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , soldiers
...ird, the article claims that, those days,soldiers could use flaming arrows instead of the...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, third, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 22.412803532 62% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1117.0 1373.03311258 81% => OK
No of words: 217.0 270.72406181 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14746543779 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48882912714 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.594470046083 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 335.7 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9968253248 49.2860985944 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.111111111 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06452816374 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267336736742 0.272083759551 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103263248953 0.0996497079465 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614142762932 0.0662205650399 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159601076729 0.162205337803 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034138814376 0.0443174109184 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.42419426049 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 63.6247240618 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.