The lecture and reading both discuss motif of line appear in skeleton bones of fossil. Some paleontologists claim that this line represented the feather of Sinosauropteryx. According to the reading passage, many critics argue about the feather of dinosaur. The lecturer casts doubt the claims of reading passage. He says that evidence behind the skeleton bone strongly suggest that this were feather of the dinosaur and critics arguments are unconvincing.
First of all, the critics emphasizes that fine lines represent the skin fibers. When animal died than, it buried under the volcanic ash. Decomposed skin change in to fibers. The lecturer challenged this point made in the reading passage. He mentions that this line not fibers because of as same site many other fossils were presents but none of the fossil were decomposed. So, presence of volcanic ash does not change the fossil structure but well preserve functional structure.
Secondly, the critic argues that fossils were not feather but its frills. The lecturer rebuts the critic argument. He explains that frills and feathers had different composition. Beta carotene found in fossil which is present in feathers not in frill, therefore fossils was feathers of dinosaur.
Lastly, the critic states that fine line situated along with back bone and tail which were represented that its not feathers. Since feathers function was regulating temperature and fly, the structure are not made like this. The lecturer, in contrast, points out that birds and other animal also have different function of feather. For instance, the peacock has tail colorful feather to attract mate. As similarly, the Sinosauropteryx feathers has orange and white color suggest different function.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...keleton bone strongly suggest that this were feather of the dinosaur and critics arg...
^^^^
Line 1, column 393, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...on bone strongly suggest that this were feather of the dinosaur and critics arguments a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'feathered'.
Suggestion: feathered
...the critic argues that fossils were not feather but its frills. The lecturer rebuts the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, lastly, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, in contrast, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1465.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 272.0 270.72406181 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38602941176 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65989280539 2.5805825403 103% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551470588235 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.116997792494 855% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 21.2450331126 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.1075162115 49.2860985944 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.25 110.228320801 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.6 21.698381199 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.95 7.06452816374 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.459864964165 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129328894261 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077317271905 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271837766097 0.162205337803 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494894935241 0.0443174109184 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.8541721854 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.0289183223 76% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.39 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.498013245 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.