TPO-31 - Integrated Writing Task A fossil skeleton of a dinosaur called Sinosauropteryx, preserved in volcanic ash, was discovered in Liaoning, China, in 1996. Interestingly, the fossil included a pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones. Some

The reading and the lecture are both about a Sinosauropteryx's fossil skeleton, which has a particular pattern of fine lines surrounding his skeleton. The author of the reading claims that this pattern of lines is not the remains of feathers, whereas the lecturer believes that these lines are a strong evidence that the Sinosauropteryx had feathers.

First of all, the author contends that the lines could not even be a functional structure of a living dinosaur, but rather a structure formed at a later stage. Furthermore, he thinks that the lines could also be the residual fiber from skin decomposition. The lecturer debuts this claims using the example of other fossils discovered in the same area, which have no evidence of skin decomposition, so the theory of fiber is likely wrong.

Second, the author argues that not even the scientists have identified precisely if this was a real body structure which belongs to the dinosaur. The author suggests that it might be an ornamental structure such as frills. The lecturer, on the other hand, excludes that it can be frills, mentioning that chemical analysis has shown the presence of Beta-carotene, which is normally present only in feathers and not in frills.

Finally, the lecturer points out that the feathers have not only a function to regulate the internal temperature or assist the animal when flying, but often feathers are used to attracts mates and for displays, therefore, the position over the spine bone and tail could be the remains of feather used for mating.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'attract'.
Suggestion: attract
... flying, but often feathers are used to attracts mates and for displays, therefore, the ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, so, therefore, whereas, such as, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 254.0 270.72406181 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06299212598 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81306306837 2.5805825403 109% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555118110236 0.540411800872 103% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 21.2450331126 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.7355494147 49.2860985944 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.888888889 110.228320801 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2222222222 21.698381199 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.06452816374 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.393575983181 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154789737424 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780682713172 0.0662205650399 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211426299501 0.162205337803 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761995495082 0.0443174109184 172% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.3589403974 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.8541721854 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.0289183223 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.498013245 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.