The reading states that the Russian submarines would occasionally hear strange sounds during their patrolling and provides three theses of support. However, the lecture claims that the source of giant sound is so doubtful and refutes each of the author's reasons.
First, the article argues that strange sounds can be related to male and female orca whales during a courtship ritual. The professor opposes this point by discussing the author's suggestion of whales. he states that the orca lives under the surface not as deeply as submarines.
Second, the reading claims that squid can be considered as an other hypothesis. The professor refutes this point by saying that the sounds lasted for two decades and it is impossible that a squid old in 20 years. Moreover, incredibly it is hard to be convinced that sound of squid has been started 20 years ago and lasted till now and has been stopped now.
Finally, the article posists that another military submarine were patrolling secretly belong to strange country. In contrast, the professor opposes this point by giving some explanations about speed of submarine. He says that submarines can not move so rapidly and can not change their direction. Furthermore, the technology of building submarines which can move silently is not exist thus a secret submarine can not move quickly and silently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 171, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...or opposes this point by discussing the authors suggestion of whales. he states that th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: He
...ssing the authors suggestion of whales. he states that the orca lives under the su...
^^
Line 6, column 60, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... claims that squid can be considered as an other hypothesis. The professor refutes this ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 380, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'existed'.
Suggestion: existed
...bmarines which can move silently is not exist thus a secret submarine can not move qu...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, moreover, second, so, thus, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 30.3222958057 66% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1137.0 1373.03311258 83% => OK
No of words: 220.0 270.72406181 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16818181818 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59807223511 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 419.366225166 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1123374417 49.2860985944 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 94.75 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281529980494 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972565927495 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0651505575123 0.0662205650399 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163889746267 0.162205337803 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050632981934 0.0443174109184 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 63.6247240618 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.