The author states that unfamiliar sound in the ocean during 1960s and 1980s was created as a result of some factors and provides three reasons of support. However, the professor explains about they cannot find out source of the sound and refutes each of the authors’ reasons.
First, the reading claims that male and female orca whales has made the weird sound in order to attract each other. The professor rejects this point by saying that orca whales nearly live near the surface of the water while the submarine was located deep in the ocean. She states that it was unable to hear the sound was reached from shallow surface.
Second, the article posits that giant squid habitat deep in the ocean from the past until now produced the noise. However, the professor say that the noise was detected by submarine in 1960 to 1980 and then stopped. According to the professor, the sound just lasted for 20 years by contrast squid lived more than 20 years there.
Third, the reading says that the sound can be sent out by the foreign submarines accidentally. The professor oppose this point by explaining that the sound move around quickly and also submarines engine make some noise but there is not technology that can move fast same as the sound or make engine silence.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'during the 1960s'.
Suggestion: during the 1960s
...ates that unfamiliar sound in the ocean during 1960s and 1980s was created as a result of so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ssor explains about they cannot find out source of the sound and refutes each of ...
^^^
Line 7, column 110, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'opposes'.
Suggestion: opposes
... submarines accidentally. The professor oppose this point by explaining that the sound...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'while', 'as a result']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253112033195 0.261695866417 97% => OK
Verbs: 0.161825726141 0.158904122519 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.045643153527 0.0723426182421 63% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0580912863071 0.0435111971325 134% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0124481327801 0.0277247811725 45% => OK
Prepositions: 0.145228215768 0.128828473217 113% => OK
Participles: 0.045643153527 0.0370669169778 123% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.20683701352 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0165975103734 0.0208969081088 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00829875518672 0.00154638098197 537% => OK
Determiners: 0.141078838174 0.128158765124 110% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0124481327801 0.0158828679856 78% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00414937759336 0.0114777025283 36% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1281.0 1645.83664459 78% => OK
No of words: 221.0 271.125827815 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.7963800905 6.08160592843 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04852973271 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.316742081448 0.374372842146 85% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.199095022624 0.287516216867 69% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.122171945701 0.187439937562 65% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0678733031674 0.113142543107 60% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.20683701352 2.5805825403 86% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58371040724 0.539623497131 108% => OK
Word variations: 56.784947386 53.8517498576 105% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 13.0529801325 77% => OK
Sentence length: 22.1 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5569418852 49.3711431718 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.1 132.220823453 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1 21.7502111507 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 42.0095022624 50.5018328374 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.91071428571 1.90840788429 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.637522990291 0.549887131256 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.162733760292 0.142949733639 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0495275260186 0.0787303798458 63% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.71466790511 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0911760593147 0.139662658121 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.353835747726 0.266732575781 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782542631602 0.103435571967 76% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.449696977239 0.414875509568 108% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0483247523958 0.0530846634433 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.468482602323 0.40443939384 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303790515359 0.0528353158467 57% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.26048565121 94% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 3.49668874172 86% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 10.2958057395 87% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.