tpo 34
The reading discusses several theories about the extinction of specific marine species called Steller's sea cow. However, the lecturer finds the ideas dubious and casts doubt on each theory proposed by the reading passage.
First, the author argues that they might have been overhunted by native people. Conversely, the lecturer brings up the idea that they were so enormous and massive that they could feed many people while the number of people in that area was not that much, so they did not need overhunting these animals. Therefore, it is not reasonable that they became extinct by the native people.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that ecosystems' severe changes might have been the other reason for their decimation. On the contrary, the professor underlines the fact that if any environmental change had happened, it would have affected all the plants in the area, not just one type of them. As researchers did not find any declination in any other plant's population, it is highly unlikely that environmental changes caused this extinction.
Finally, the reading passage asserts that the root cause of extinction might have been hunting by traders who came from European countries. In contrast, the speaker dismisses the issue due to the fact that although the extinction has just happened after European traders entered the area, the population of these species had gone under intense decrease 100 years before. As a result, this theory also will be excluded due to its erroneous assumption.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'plants'' or 'plant's'?
Suggestion: plants'; plant's
...d not find any declination in any other plants population, it is highly unlikely that ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, conversely, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, while, in contrast, as a result, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1373.03311258 93% => OK
No of words: 246.0 270.72406181 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17886178862 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58209129437 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.540411800872 113% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4574364752 49.2860985944 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 21.698381199 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283735915933 0.272083759551 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988143564461 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634303668178 0.0662205650399 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142412799709 0.162205337803 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127930704476 0.0443174109184 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.3589403974 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.