Based on the reading materials, the author stated that there are 3 evidences regarding that cloud seeding is an effective method in protecting crops from hail. However, the professor finds this idea bereft of sufficient reasoning and cites some ideas to the contrary.
Initially, the author argued that based on the laboratory experiments, cloud seeding is an effective method owing to the fact that by adding silver iodide to cold water vapor, scientists have seen that instead of hail, snow will be formed. However, the lecturer refuted this idea by stating that these laboratory experiments may be not effective in real life, because by adding silver iodide to cold water vapor, any precipitation, like snow, rain, and hail will form and these experiments can increase the risk of droughtness in those areas, which would be very harmful for crops.
Another point mentioned by the writer of the reading passage was that evidences from Asia have shown that this method is useful. In Asian countries, cloud seeding are used in urban areas and have some positive results showing that this method can be used to protect crops and farming fields in the United States. That being said, the professor repudiated this one too by clarifying that in Asian countries, this method is used in urban cities with high amount of air pollution. Air pollution can be favorable for cloud seeding, but in unpolluted areas this method is futile.
The final point discussed by the author was that local studies support the effectiveness of cloud seeding owing to the fact that scientists directly have observed that by using this method, the amount of damages to the crops due to hail is decreased. Yet again, the lecturer criticized this idea. She stated that this declination is not only in that area which this method is used, but also is in whole areas around that site, which would be as a result of natural weather conditions of the local area, not the cloud seeding method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this laboratory' or 'these laboratories'?
Suggestion: this laboratory; these laboratories
...turer refuted this idea by stating that these laboratory experiments may be not effective in rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, regarding, so, as to, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.4613686534 191% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 30.3222958057 142% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1633.0 1373.03311258 119% => OK
No of words: 331.0 270.72406181 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9335347432 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46033882417 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495468277946 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 419.366225166 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.51434878587 264% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 21.2450331126 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.4803759254 49.2860985944 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.454545455 110.228320801 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0909090909 21.698381199 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.06452816374 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 53.8541721854 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.91 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.42419426049 107% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 63.6247240618 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.498013245 133% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.2008830022 125% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.