The passage posits three theories about the how agnostids may have lived. However, the professor refutes the each theory and provides the three counter argument.
Firstly, the article implies that agnostids hunted the small animal as free swimming predator. On the contrary with this, the lecturer mentions that free swimming predator have very developed eye and they have sharp eyes for find the predators. But, agnotids have small and poor eyes, even some time they were blind. Predator if chase their prey they need the sensory organ to recognize to prey, and agnostids fossil not any sensory organ is founded.
Secondly, the passage emphasizes that agnostids were sea dwellers because of they were living the same as seafloor dwellers. In contrast with this, the speaker explains that sea dweller move slow and mostly not dispersed in the area. But the agnostids were found in the very large distance which is predicted that they were move fast. High speed is unusual for the seafloor dweller.
Thirdly, the author states that agnostids were parasites because of living and feeding off larger organism. On the other hand, the professor points out that since parasite mostly killed by the host organism, parasite population was small. But, agnostids are vast amount found in the fossil. Greater amount of population is not convincing that they were parasites.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...The passage posits three theories about the how agnostids may have lived. However, the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 67, Rule ID: BECAUSE_OF_I[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'because they' instead.
Suggestion: because they
...asizes that agnostids were sea dwellers because of they were living the same as seafloor dwelle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...iving the same as seafloor dwellers. In contrast with this, the speaker explains that se...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'moved'.
Suggestion: moved
...tance which is predicted that they were move fast. High speed is unusual for the sea...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, well, even so, in contrast, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.4613686534 124% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 30.3222958057 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 1373.03311258 84% => OK
No of words: 221.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19004524887 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28586966803 2.5805825403 89% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.540411800872 109% => OK
syllable_count: 346.5 419.366225166 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0472417152 49.2860985944 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9285714286 110.228320801 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7857142857 21.698381199 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92857142857 7.06452816374 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458208999471 0.272083759551 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146804920335 0.0996497079465 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826075876827 0.0662205650399 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247318851313 0.162205337803 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044313549097 0.0443174109184 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.42419426049 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.